Five and a half degrees negative camber. Did I do it on purpose? No, that’s actually as positive as my adjustments allow me, with the parts I chose. Is it fast? Maybe not. My braking sure suffers, but surprisingly, it does seem to make good use of the tires in corners. Soft, narrow, bubbly tires sure help that happen though. Do I like it? Yah. I like it a lot.
Soft, narrow bubbly tires: look at that outside rear slip over. For me at least, this goes a long ways towards making driving fun. Gotta have a good relationship with your car, gotta be able to understand what’s going on and respond. Yes those are 6J wheels in 185 rubber. Not that engineers always get things right, but surprise surprise, that’s what Dunlop says I should be running. I know you think I should be running 9J, or at least some 8’s… but I’m sure you think that hot girl who just lies down and takes it, is something exciting as well. IMO, both are good for impressing your friends and little else.
The goal of my vehicle set up as I’ve suggested, is not to build the fastest machine possible, but instead to build a driving toy that will help me re-hone my skills, and maximize the amount of fun I can have with a car that isn’t actually “competitively” built for any form of motor sports.
As I started out saying, 5.5 degrees of negative camber. Seems like a lot, but this photo shows pretty well how I still end up using the full tire. Of course, throw some body roll in and you can see that the inside tire probably sits at more like 8 or 10 degrees negative mid-corner, and that effectively makes it useless in this situation. But it practically already is anyways. With big stiff springs and a massive sway bar up front, approximate calculations say that there is only 50lbs of weight on it at 1g lateral acceleration.
The big benefit of all that camber is not better overall grip, but camber thrust. Camber thrust makes things challenging on the street, but it works awesome on the track to help the car turn in hard. We all have our standards and ideas of what is good, but this car turns in better than anything I’ve ever driven. Toe-In helps. I’m running a little more than an 1/8″. Talk on the internet says that toe-out is better for turn in and overall grip. For turn in? I’m not there. It can help overall front grip through tight turns where factory ackermann is not sufficient. There are a couple of reasons that I don’t care about ackermann, but the obvious one is because my inside tire is barely on the ground. I feel like toe-in gives better turn in and feel, but as an added benefit it helps counter all the instabilities that large amounts of negative camber can cause.
Regarding caster and KPI. My hope was to minimize KPI and maximize caster. Thinking about weight jacking, such a set up transfers weight to the outside rear tire under positive steering angle (i.e. turning into the corner), and helps the car break into oversteer should a push develop. Ideally though, the car turns in hard and neutrally and I have no need for highly positive steering angles. Should I find myself in a state of high oversteer, the weight jacking effects of caster will transfer weight to the inside rear tire and outside front in countersteer and thus help the car return to a more neutral state AND really help me put the power down. This does make throwing the car around easy and fun, and even gives you the impression that you’re really fast because you leave your foot on the floor all the time. It’s a trick however… at least if you let angle and washout get as big as I often do.
The camber changes caused by this caster set up are not as favorable, but that’s largely because my static camber is so high already. Under positive steering angle, when the car is possibly in a state of understeer, the outside tire gets more negative camber which at that point is probably becoming a little excessive. Under negative steering angle, the outside front camber angle becomes more positive, which helps the front of the car wash out and return to a neutral state.
Thoughts for next time? I have no plans to change anything. My driving can be a lot better. Particularly I need to drive a good line rather than let the car turn in and take what ever path it chooses. If I struggle again, my next step would be to remove the rear sway bar. Not only would that help the rear stay planted, it would also give me a little more body roll which could help to calm things down further. It is looking like I might be a match for some cars running in the STX class. Eventually my pride will return and I’ll actually want to beat them, even if cams and other things have me in SM with really fast cars. The way I see it though, a GD Impreza with solid footwork, a basic power up and similar rubber in 255 size should be a lot faster than me.
But maybe I’m already making excuses.
All these pictures are belong to Ian Gulinao. Thanks Ian. They actually make this way more fun for me.
Sick man, you get so tech.
I just feel man…. haha
What are you running up front, nrca’s as well as longer arms?
How do you like the new rubber? Is the 185 60 14 sweet? better than the azenis? just better size?
Oh and where were you last night? no dori for Q?
Not that my car was running but I missed you at the autox and was thinking maybe just maybe I would see you out.
Yah, 20mm offset NRCA’s. I’m still a fan despite the negatives.
It’s been too long for me to really compare anything. Seems this is the most driveable car I’ve experienced though, and a lot of it could be the tires. The Azenis were not this predictable. I remember really fighting with them when I first put them on. I’m so into 185/60 but I’m sad that I can’t keep up with the modern cars on fatter rubber. I’m already shopping wider stuff… but only marginally. 205/50 13 seems likely.
My ride height is much up too. About 1.5″ in the back, and over 2″ in the front from your setting. You can see how much more it rolls around in the pictures… and I think that suits my driving style… or skill.
I developed a pretty huge oil leak at auto-x though, and spent Wednesday night fixing it and getting ready for auto-x in Red Deer on Saturday, rather than drifting. Seems like some o-rings dried up over the winter.
The oval though… it really doesn’t interest me.
Haha, Ya rcmp is looking pretty dumpy.
Small tires make it fun, too much grip is cool but, not as involved?
Where was the leak?
I had a cam gear leak but replaced the cam gear seals.
Have fun in Deadrear
Although I did fairly decent at the SASC T&T event, I think my competitors in STX would be faster, especially those with AWD and boost variety. Jason Morrow (’02 Silver WRX) was pretty fast last year in ESP, not sure if he’ll be slower in a detuned STX setup, Grant C (Edmontonian with Blue ’04 WRX) was also fast last year and when Steve Kibble gets some real rubber in his E36, I think he’ll be fast too.
I’m not throwing in the towel though, I’ll fight ’em with my 1550 kg open diff Toyota! You can take my car for a fun run or two at the event, maybe you’ll feel the AE86 soul and lineage despite the porky weight?
The AWD guys are limited to 245mm wide rubber and 8″ wide rims, by the way and 2WD are limited to 265 tires and 9″ wide rims in STX.